RETHINK survey for institution Section I - Core features of the practiceOrganisation details Institution name: Institution type: Country: Choose...AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, The Democratic Republic of TheCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D'ivoireCroatiaCubaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-bissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and Mcdonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and The GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbia and MontenegroSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and The South Sandwich IslandsSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-lesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuelaViet NamVirgin Islands, BritishVirgin Islands, U.S.Wallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe Institution url: Title of the practice: Format of activity(select up to FIVE choices, if relevant) Seminar Training Workshop Guided tour Extra-mural site visit (e.g., other institution, memorial, or historical site; outdoor location such as urban neighbourhood; etc) Exhibition Instructional material (textbook, lesson plan, primary source, etc) OtherTarget population of activity(select up to FIVE choices, if relevant) Students Young people (not students) Educators in formal settings (secondary school, vocational college, university) Educators in non-formal settings (e.g., youth workers; training professionals; other practitioners) Police or other law enforcement population Legal professionals (lawyers, jurists, etc) Government employees or representatives (e.g., public servants at local or national level; elected officials at local or national level) Civil society and non-profit leaders (e.g., community advocates; foundation / association leaders; trade unionists) General public/non-specialist audience OtherCost per practice: Free 10-50 euros 51-100 euros 101-200 euros 201-500 euros 501-1000 euros More than 1000 euros Not applicableSetting required for practice.(select up to THREE choices, if relevant) Your institution Other institution (e.g., museum, place of worship, library or archive, other public building, etc) School Designated extra-mural memorial or historical site (e.g., World War II memorial or monument) Outdoor urban location (e.g., urban walk or guided tour) Other extra-mural site (e.g., non-urban location) No specific setting required (e.g., online practice)Which central themes or keywords describe the practice? (select up to FIVE choices, if relevant) Remembrance education and/or history education Citizenship/democracy education Antisemitism Racism Xenophobia and other prejudices (e.g., Islamophobia) Human rights/discrimination Radicalization prevention The Holocaust and/or other genocides Media literacy (i.e., the ability to evaluate different types of media and generate own content) Critical thinking Teaching and learning methods/guidelinesWhat are the central components or activities of the practice? (select up to FIVE choices, if relevant) Internet research Group work Group discussion Written activity Creative activity (drawing, painting, sound recording, etc) Film viewing Image analysis Textual analysis Lecture Testimonial Slide presentation Other Next Section II - Additional information about the practiceTarget populationNumber of participants to whom the practice is geared Up to 5 Up to 14 Up to 34 Up to 99 More than 100 Not applicableAge of target population 6-10 years 11-15 16-18 19-25 26+ yearsAdditional specifics or defining characteristics of target population National/local specifities (e.g. activity targeted to Swedish school students) Race/ethnicity Senior citizens People with disabilities Educationally and socially disadvantaged groups. Specify: Religious affiliation. Specify: Professional background not listed in Q.4 (e.g., journalists). Specify: Other - please specify: NoneComponents of the practicePlease describe the topic and objectives of the practice. When answering, please be sure to be specific about the activity’s central topic, the time period it covers if applicable, and its principal learning objectives (e.g., “antisemitism and right-wing extremism in Germany from 1930s-today, focusing on imagery (posters, propaganda, films, etc). The practice seeks to help participants interpret and analyze visual material, and understand the media’s role in representing and circulating racist representations”).What materials are used for the practice? (select up to FIVE choices, if relevant). Written or other published material (e.g., textbooks, primary sources, newspaper articles, etc) Material culture, i.e., physical object or setting (e.g., exhibition display) Audiovisual material (e.g., film, images, photos) Online material (website, digital archive, slide presentation such as Powerpoint…) Craft supplies (crayons, paint, tracing paper, etc) Not applicable Other – please specify: Link to material: Please indicate any materials produced by the participants, if applicable (select up to FIVE choices, if relevant). Written material (e.g., travel diary, response paper, drawing) Instructional material (e.g., model lesson or syllabus, training materials, etc) Audiovisual material (e.g., film, images, photos, interview) Online material (website, digital exhibition, slide presentation such as Powerpoint…) Not applicable Other – please specify: Please describe the sequence of activities for the practice, including its pedagogical approach and / or methodology, if applicable. Length of activity. Up to 5 hours 5 to 8 hours 8 to 15 hours More than 15 hours Other – please specify: Is the activity digital? Yes. Please enter URL: No.Accessibility and replicability of practiceLanguage(s) in which activity can be delivered. (check all that apply). AbkhazianAfarAfrikannsAlbanianAmharicArabicArmenianAssameseAymaraAzerbaijaniBashkirBasqueBengali, BanglaBhutaniBihariBislamaBretonBulgarianBurmeseByelorussianCambodianCatalanChinese (Mandarin)CorsicanCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglish, AmericanEsperantoEstonianFaeroeseFijiFinnishFrenchFrisianGaelic (Scots Gaelic)GalicianGeorgianGermanGreekGreenlandicGuaraniGujaratiHausaHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianInterlinguaInterlingueInupiakIrishItalianJapaneseJavaneseKannadaKashmiriKazakhKinyarwandaKirghizKirundiKoreanKurdishLaothianLatinLatvian, LettishLingalaLithuanianMacedonianMalagasyMalayMalayalamMalteseMaoriMarathiMoldavianMongolianNauruNepaliNorwegianOccitanOriyaOromo, AfanPashto, PushtoPersianPolishPortuguesePunjabiQuechuaRhaeto-RomanceRomanianRussianSamoanSangroSanskritSerbianSerbo-CroatianSesothoSetswanaShonaSindhiSinghaleseSiswatiSlovakSlovenianSomaliSpanishSudaneseSwahiliSwedishTagalogTajikTamilTatarTeluguThaiTibetanTigrinyaTongaTsongaTurkishTurkmenTwiUkranianUrduUzbekVietnameseVolapukWelshWolofXhosaYiddishYorubaZulu Is specialist knowledge or professional training required to deliver the practice? (see Q. 20 below). Yes NoIf so, which type of specialist background or professional knowledge? Legal training Law enforcement (e.g., police) Formal educational training and/or certification (e.g., teacher) Government or public policy Remembrance, history, or museum education Experience with public engagement, community work, or grassroots activism Other – please specify: Previous Next Section III - Qualitative detailsThis section seeks to gain insight into the aims and impact of the practice: its learning outcomes, its evaluation, and other details that will demonstrate why this is a good and effective practice for your institution and the publics you serve.Has this practice been evaluated? Yes How many times? <5 5-10 >10 No [skip to Q. 24]By whom? (select up to FIVE choices). Participants (e.g., students) Informal non-participant observer (e.g., teacher of the students to whom practice is geared) Instructor delivering the practice Internal evaluator (e.g., colleagues from your institution) Formal external evaluator (e.g., by professional, regulatory, or funding body)By what means? (select up to FIVE choices). Informal verbal feedback Formal verbal feedback (e.g., interview) Qualitative written feedback (e.g., open-response questions) Quantitative survey Other – please specify: What content knowledge and transferable skills (e.g., critical thinking) do you want participants to take away from this practice? (Examples might include: the ability to evaluate different types of media and generate their own content; a critical understanding of history and historical sources; giving teachers the methodological tools to use history education to impart citizenship skills to their students, etc). What makes this activity an effective practice for your institution and /or the public it serves? In other words, what are your indicators of success for this practice? (e.g., quantifiable impact, cost efficiency, repeat demand, interactive pedagogical method, highly adaptable / scalable, addresses new topic or target population, etc.)Please provide the contact details of your institution's educational coordinator Name: Email address: Previous Next Section IV - ScalabilityThe RETHINK project is concerned with adapting formal education practices to informal education settings, and vice-versa. For this reason, this section asks about the factors that make a practice adaptable and the challenges in doing so.What are the key preconditions or factors for successful implementation of this practice? Pre-knowledge of the audience Materials needed Specific setting (e.g., needs to be held at a specific site) Subject expertise of presenter/instructor Other factor – please specify: None In your opinion, what are the main challenges to teachers adapting this practice for their students? Availability of guidance/training/replication materials (and in what language / format currently) Other comments or details. By filling out this form, you agree to our Privacy Policy terms in accordance with the EU Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR). Previous Survey most Frequently Asked Questions: FAQ